In english, you also can see this theme with larger images here:
For a better understanding of the differential diagnosis of chondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma, let’s discuss the case:
Case description, discussion and treatment:
Female patient, 39 years old , odontologist , right handed. The patient refers pain in his right shoulder for about eight months. The first doctor performs radiographs of the cervical spine and indicated physical therapy for cervical spine ( Figure 1). Not getting better, performs magnetic resonance imaging of the ervical spine, which showed no cervical lesions(Figure 2).
However, analysis of this examination showed lesions in the proximal humeral metaphysis, characterized by low signal and intermediate signal in T1 and high signal on T2 ( Figures 3 and 4 ).
After a week , new resonance examination was conducted to evaluate this finding. This humeral resonance imaging showed a solid lesion , heterogeneous, with low signal and intermediate signal on T1, replacing the bone marrow fat (Figure 4a ).
In the sagittal T1 spir, we see escaloped erosion of the endostal cortex.(Figure 4.b ).
Careful analysis of magnetic resonance images, showed the aggressive characteristics of the lesion: with erosion of endosteal cortex; areas with hyposignal and areas of hyperintensity , heterogeneous pattern, with contrast uptake and calcification foci , which are most evident in the resonance PD ( proton density ) (Figures 5.a – 5.d ).
The radiograph of this region, held on 24 July 2003 , two weeks later , highlighted the presence of this metadiafisiary injury, occupying two thirds of the proximal humerus.
This image shows scalloped areas due to the erosion of the endostal cortex, making the secondary enlargement of the bone marrow and areas of condensation dotted with cotton wool spots aspect , suggesting calcified foci (Figure 6.a ).
After this finding , it was referred to oncologist , requesting tests to investigate and stage the lesion . Scintigraphy performed: uptake was observed only in the right humerus (Figure 6.b).
Then a biopsy which revealed cartilage tissue without atypia , suggesting new biopsy ( Figure 7).
The shoulder pain and imaging findings of aggressive lesion with calcified foci, indicate the possibility of Chondrosarcoma. In this case the differential diagnoses between Chondroma and more remotely from Bone Infarction should be discarded due to the following considerations:
1- The patient went to the doctor because of progressive pain, was not a casual examination found.
2- The rays show metaphyseal enlargement, endostal cortex erosion and foci of calcification, which associated with the clinical symptoms indicates that it is active lesion, with local aggressiveness and points to the diagnosis of Chondrosarcoma. 3- The MR complement the image data and awaken the reasoning, concluding the same diagnosis.
4- The biopsy revealed that it was a “cartilaginous tissue,” there is no logic to suggest new biopsy in this situation.
A second biopsy, in this case, became in an academic discussion because of the histopathological diagnosis of Chondroma and Chondrosarcoma grade I is often difficult, and the conduct of the treatment here is surgical. As we know that surgery is the only treatment that can cure Chondrosarcoma, this case must be approached and treated surgically as a Chondrosarcoma, regardless of whether the eventual biopsy comes with the previous diagnosis of Chondroma. The biopsy may have its indication just to confirm that it is a cartilage injury.
The first doctor chose to perform a biopsy, with Jamshidi needle. The result of the pathological examination was cartilaginous lesions without atypia. Concerned about the aggressive image of the lesion did not feel peaceful in treating the case as a chondroma and not of assume a policy of treating as a Chondrosarcoma. Proposed to observe patient for two months.
After this period the patient returns, still with the same clinical feature. The doctor indictes new MR, observing the same previous aspects, the biopsy scar and a new findin:the presence of extra-cortical tumor, infected all subcutaneous tissue (Figures 8a 8.b, 8.c and 9 ).
After this last exam , the doctor offers to perform another biopsy. The patient decides to consult another professional , seeking a second opinion and joint us.
The specialist in orthopedic oncology, must complete the diagnosis and define the conduct at this time . Must not launch a new biopsy because what action it will take if this biopsy is not conclusive for Chondrosarcoma ? What to do if the result is Chondroma ?
With clinical data that revealed progressive pain, imaging with locally aggressive lesion and even the pathology of cartilage injury, the expert has all the parameters to indicate the treatment of this injury as Chondrosarcoma , for the histopathological diagnosis of Chondroma and Chondrosarcoma Grade I it is very difficult and sometimes controversial (Figures 10 and 11).
The same slide, presented to the same pathologist, after some time, may have changed the report of Chondroma to Chondrosarcoma to Grade I or Grade I Chondrosarcoma to Chondroma. Still, if this same slide is displayed to other pathologists, we can get the two different diagnoses. We know that the final diagnosis of bone tumors must have CLINICAL-RADIOLOGICAL and pathologic correlation. The pathologist usually is only analyzing the blade. Who is leading the case is who has all the data. We must therefore enhance the imaging and all the clinical picture in this situation.
After these considerations, surgical treatment is necessary. Chondrosarcoma is unresponsive to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. It can be cured with surgical resection with oncologic margin, because unfortunately relies on locally when this margin is not achieved. In relapse can occur dedifferentiation, invasion of adjacent tissues that impede the limb salvage surgery, as well as providing the occurrence of metastases.
You can not miss the opportunity to heal this injury with the appropriate surgery.
Careful analysis of the images of this case indicates the need for wide resection with margin and replacement with nonconventional prosthesis.
It is contraindicated intralesional curettage, even with adjuvant site and fill with cement, because the recurrence and dedifferentiation are frequent with this conduct.
After this clarification to the patient, we perform a resection of two proximal humerus thirds, including the skin and the path of the biopsy, because in addition of Chondrosarcoma can deploy soft tissue, this was already happening in this case in the biopsy path.
For the reconstruction of the humerus, we employ a nonconventional endoprosthesis built in polyethylene. These are lighter than metal, have elasticity similar to that of bone and allow drilling holes, where necessary, to reattach the remaining ligaments and muscles. Around the polyethylene is a fibrotic reaction involving the prosthesis and fixed definitely the soft tissues reinserted.
In detail, we present the steps of the surgery, reconstruction with endoprosthesis and pathological anatomy of the piece (figures 12 to 23).
The oncologic surgery should first seek resection in order to obtain margins decreasing the possibility of local recurrence . Reached this goal , the best reconstruction should be performed to restore function , the closer to normal point. In nonconventional endoprostheses, made to reconstruct tumor resection, we can not be expected the same function as conventional prostheses used in arthritis or in other indications, since in each case there will be a loss of muscles and healthy soft tissues, larger or smaller, resected due to need to obtain oncologic margin.
Physiotherapy driven professional who knows the surgery is critical to achieve a good functional results (Figures 24 to 27).
We can observe the funtional outcome three years after surgery ( Video 1 ).
After ten years and seven months the patient did not present any complaint. Leans casually in his chair on the right elbow operated arm (Figure 28) , can raise his hand to his mouth (Figure 29Aa), good internal rotation (Figure 29b).
The patient has good function and works very well , without any difficulty , in their professional activities as Odontologist ( Video 2 ).
The patient has good function and plays very well, without any difficulty, their professional activities (Video 2).
In english, you also can see this theme with larger images here: http://bit.ly/Condrosarcoma_english
En español, se puede ver el tema con imágenes más grandes aquí: http://bit.ly/Condrosarcoma_espanhol
Em portugês, você também pode ver este tema com imagens maiores aqui: http://bit.ly/Condrossarcoma
Chondrosarcoma is the primary malignant bone tumor more frequent after osteosarcoma 23,24). The central subtype is the most common and affects more than five times the periferic (3), there are also rare subtypes of clear and mesenchymal cells (2).
Normally arises in the bones of endochondral origin and mainly at the root of the limbs (shoulder, pelvis, rib and spine (1)) are rare in the membranous origin (24,11,15,14). It is slow growing and often the patient seeks treatment when the lesion presents major. This tumor can affect any age, with prevalence between 30 and 40 years (7, 11, 22), with reference in the literature since three years (15) to 73 years old (1).
It is a malignant tumor of mesenchymal nature, producing interstitial substance and cells that assume aspect of hyaline cartilage, with varying degrees of immaturity and frequent calcification foci and can occur in different locations.
Can be classified according to location: A- Central , B- cortical fair (Paraosteal or Periosteal) (23,2,24,6,3), C-Peripheral (or exophytic, which occurs in the cartilaginous cap of an osteochondroma) (28) and D- Soft Tissue Chondrosarcoma (13); on the histology in: A- degree of anaplasia: are classified into grades I, II and III, dedifferentiated; B-, C- and D-:mesenchymal clear cell; as to the origin may still be: 1 primary and 2 secondary (which originates at the site of a preexisting benign cartilaginous lesion as in Oilier disease (Enchondromatosis) or Maffucci syndrome processing for Chondrosarcoma is common (20 to 30 %) (2.28), can also occur as Solitary Osteochondroma (in less than 1%, or multiple 10%) (2), and more rarely secondary to Paget’s disease.
Pain can be insidious symptoms for several years, progressing to slow growth, volume increase, mobility restriction getting skin sometimes reddish and warm (23). The first symptom is often a fracture in pathological bone (2.24).
The radiograph shows transparent radio metaphyseal lesions replacing the bone marrow that extend into the epiphysis or diaphysis , eroding the internal cortical ( lesions in piecemeal ) , inflating or expanding the medullary portion of the bone , but remaining bounded by cortical that thick.
The appearance of calcifications ( dotted such as cotton balls ( 5 ) or rings ) is frequently (23, 2 , 24, 13 , 6, 28) . These are due to the degeneration of the cartilage that receives new vascularization and calcified . This process is accelerated in Chondrosarcoma and slow in benign cartilage lesions and low grade.
The bone mapping assists in lesion staging. MR and CT are important for the evaluation of the intramedullary extension and extra osseous lesion ( 2).
The diagnosis of well-differentiated Chondrosarcoma presents difficulties and histological data from clinical history, location, imaging findings should be valued for diagnostic conclusion and definition of proper behavior (23, 14, 12 ) . The irregularity of histological minutiae in the array and the number of cells within the chondroid matrix, the core of hyperchromasia changes , polymorphism and atypical mitotic when located in members of roots must be considered grade I Chondrosarcomas , although these same histological aspects can be found in benign Chondromas of hand and feet. In microscopic descriptions are similar to Central Chondrosarcomas ( 23).
For the diagnosis we must also differentiate the pathological , clinical and radiological similarities with other injuries.
The diferential diagnosed with aneurysmal bone cyst is on the multiloculated character; with Chondroma , the Osteochondroma , Chondroblastoma , the Paraosteal and Periosteal Osteosarcoma (with cortical just Chondrosarcoma ) ( 16); Myositis Ossificans ; Fibroma Chondromyxoid ; T.G.C. and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ( 23 , 6, 28) . The Clear Cell Chondrosarcoma has intra lesional formation of reactive bone may cause confusion with Osteosarcoma . The Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma is formed by small round cells that resemble Hemangiopericytoma and Ewing’s sarcoma ( 14). The central Chondroma of long bones, Chondrosarcoma and Bone Infarction are often difficult to diagnose , requiring periodically clinical and radiographic evaluation to monitor the evolution of injury and definition of conduct.
A biopsy can often not definitive for diagnosis ( 23, 28 , 12).
The treatment of Chondrosarcoma is exclusively surgery (25 ) , should be chosen a wide resection , including the path of the biopsy (21, 13). Radiation therapy is ineffective ( 6) in controlling this cancer. For cases of grade III can be argued chemotherapy indication to the protocol used for large cell high-grade sarcomas . Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma in which present predominance of small cell undifferentiated , discussed the chemotherapy lies with the treatment protocol of Ewing ‘s sarcoma. In both cases the response to chemotherapy is usually poor ( 6). The treatment of this cancer should be individualized for each clinical subtype.
Complications occur hematogenous metastases to the lungs ( 28) , may also present lymphatic dissemination and local recurrence. Many chondrosarcomas feature local invasion trend (14 ), reaching enormous sizes becoming inoperable and causing death by this local complications propagation.
The local recurrence increases the incidence of lung metastases ( 21).
1- What are the radiographic features of Central Chondrosarcoma ?
a) Intra and extra medullary ossification.
b) Diaphyseal lesion with bone thinning and triangle of Codman with coarse lamellar reaction.
c) Areas of bone thinning , internal cortical erosion and calcification foci.
d) Bone condensing areas with periosteal reaction onion skin.
Answer: c) the cartilaginous tissue is more radiopaque than bone and thus presents itself as causing bone thinning and enlargement of medullary lesions in the bone marrow cousing cortical erosion . This growing cartilaginous tissue gets vascular sprouts and cartilage comes into regression due to calcification.
2- What are the characteristics of the MR of Chondrosarcoma ?
a) hyper- signal in T1, T2 and low signal with contrast enhancement.
b) hypo- signal in T1, hypo- signal in T2 and capture the contrast.
c)hypo- signal in T1, hyper- signal in T2 and without contrast uptake.
d)low signal on T1, high signal on T2 and capture the contrast.
Answer: d ) the cartilage tissue has low to intermediate signal on T1 . Intermediate down the cartilage and the calcified foci . Displays contrast uptake by increasing the local metabolism due to cancer.
3- What are the main differential diagnosis of Central Chondrosarcoma ?
a) Bone infarction and chondroma.
b) Osteochondroma and Ewing’s sarcoma
c) Osteomyelitis and T.G.C.
d) Osteosarcoma and condroblastoma.
Answer: a ) Bone Infarction causes damage to the bone marrow , but does not cause erosion of the inner cortex and has no evolutionary character of pain. It is usually a diagnosis finding on occasional ray.The same applies to the Chondroma that does not evolve and is only cartilaginous remains of development.
4- What is the treatment for the central chondrosarcoma ?
a) Intralesional curettage and autologous bone graft.
b) Wide resection and replacement with nonconventional endoprosthesis.
c)Intralesional curettage , location adjuvant with liquid nitrogen and homologous bone graft.
d)Intralesional curettage , local adjuvant electrotherm and bone cement.
Answer : b ) The wide resection provides oncological treatment and reconstruction with nonconventonal endoprosthesis provides the best restoration of function.
5- Histologically it is difficult differential diagnosis between:
a)Osteosarcoma and Eosinophilic granuloma.
b)Grade I Chondrosarcoma and Chondroma.
c)T.G.C and Ewing’s sarcoma.
d) Osteoblastomas and Enchondroma.
Answer: b ) The central long bones Chondroma and chondrosarcoma grade I are often difficult to histological diagnosis , it requires the radiographic evaluation for the definition and conduct.
ACKERMAN, L.V.; SPJUT, H.J. Tumors of bone and cartilage. Atlas of tumor pathology. Washington, Air Force Inst. Pathology, 1962, fasc, 4.
CANALE, S.T. Cirurgia ortopédica de Campbell. Barueri: Manole; 2006
DAHLIN, D.C. Tumores óseos . Barcelona: Ediciones Toray S/A; 1982
DORFMAN, H.D.; CZERNIAK, B. Bone tumors. St Louis, C.V. Mosby Co., 1997, cap. 7, p.410.
EDEIKEN, J.; HODES, P.J. Diagnóstico radiológico de las enfermedades de los huesos. Buenos Aires, Panamericana, 1977, cap. 15.
ETCHEBEHERE, M. Tumores cartilaginosos malignos: Condrossarcomas. In: Camargo O.P. Clínica Ortopédica. Rio de Janeiro: Med si; 2002. p. 753-759
FELDMAN, F. Cartilaginous tumors and cartilage-forming tumor like conditions of the bonés and soft tissues. In:Diseases of the Skeleton System (Roentgen Diagnosis). Part. 6 – Bone Tumors, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1977,p.177.
FLETCHER, C.D.M., Unni K.K., OMS – Merters F. (Eds.): World Health Organization. Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. IARC Press: Lyon 2002.
GREENSPAN, A. Radiologia ortopédica. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara; 2001.
HENDERSON, E.D.; Le PAGE, G. A. Apud FELDAMAN, F. Cartilaginius tumors and cartilage forming tumor like conditions of the bone and soft tissues. In: Disease of the Skeletal System (Roentgen Diagnosis). Part. 6 – Bone tumors, New York, Springer Verlag, 1977, p.182.
HUVOS, A.G. Bone tumors Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co., 1979, p. 13.
JAFFE, H.L. Tumores y estados tumorales oseos y articulares. México: La Prensa Medica Mexicana; 1966.
JESUS-GARCIA, R. – Reynaldo Jesus-Garcia
LICHTENSTEIN, L. Barcelona: Talleres Gráficos Ibero-Americanos; 1975.
LICHTESTEIN, L. Bone Tumor. 4 Ed St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co., 1972, cap. 15.
LICHTESTEIN, L.; BERNSTEIN, D. Unusual benign and malignant chondroid tumors of bone. Cancer, 12:1142, 1959.
MARCOVE, R.C. Condrosarcoma: Diagnóstico y tratamiento. In: Clínicas Ortopécias de Norteamérica. Tumores del aparato musculosquelético. Buenos Aires, Panamericana, 1977, cap. 7.
MARCOVE, R.C. et al. Chondrosarcoma of the pélvis and upper end of the femur. Na analisys of factors influencing survival time in113 cases. J. Bone Joint Surg., 54A:61, 1972.
MARCOVE, R.C.; SHOJI, H,; HARLEN, M. Altered carbohidrate metabolism in cartilaginous tumors. Contemp. Surg. 5:53, 1974.
McFARLAND, G.B.Jr.; McKINLEY, L.M.; REED, R.J. Dedifferentiation of low grade chondrosarcomas. Clin. Orthop., 122:157, 1971.
MENENDEZ, L.R. Orthopaedic knowledge update: Actualizaciones en cirugía ortopédica y traumatología. Barcelona: Ars Medica; 2003.
O’NEAL, L.W.; ACKERMAN, L. V. Chondrossarcoma of boné. Cancer, 5:551, 1952.
PRÓSPERO, J.D. Tumores Ósseos. São Paulo, Roca, 2001, cap. II.
ROBBINS. Patologia estrutural e funcional. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara; 1996.
ROMSDAHL, M.; EVANS, H.L.; AYALA, A.G. Surgical treatment of chondrosarcoma. In: Managment of primary bone and soft tissue tumors. Chicago, Year book med. Publisher Inc., 1977, p. 125.
SCHAJOWICZ, F. Tumores y Lesiones Seudotumorales de Huesos y Articulaciones. Buenos Aires: Editora Médica Panamericana; 1982.
TORNBERG, D.N.; RICE, R.W.; JOHNSTON, A.D. The ultrastructure of chondromyxoid fibroma. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Research, 95:295, 1973.
Author : Prof. Dr. Pedro Péricles Ribeiro Baptista
Oncocirurgia Ortopédica do Instituto do Câncer Dr. Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho
Office: Rua General Jardim, 846 – 41 – CEP: 01223-010 Higienópolis São Paulo – S.P.
Fone: +55 11 3231-4638 Cel: +55 11 99863-5577 Email: email@example.com